top of page
Search

SaaS-Fished: When the Demo is a Mirage


If you’ve ever watched a product video and felt your pulse quicken, congrats: you’ve been SaaS-fished. The landing page is gorgeous, the animation buttery-smooth, and the use-case looks exactly like your mess… until you meet the tool in real life and it doesn’t match the profile pic.


Here’s the pattern I keep seeing. Teams fall in love with a demo that leaves “just enough” to the imagination. Sales shows a happy path through a pristine environment, we mentally map our pain onto their promise, and each stakeholder hears what they want to hear. Ops thinks it fixes handoffs. Finance thinks it fixes reporting. IT hears “integrations are easy.” No one notices that the video UI was born in Figma and never shipped.


A recent family conversation nailed it. My brother’s shop runs Smartsheet. IT floated a move to Wrike to “cut costs.” On paper, cheaper. In practice, radically different use cases and a licensing model that turns a few paid builders + unlimited viewers into “everyone needs a seat.” The quick math: what looks like $3,600 a year for creators in one tool can balloon to five figures when a thousand casual viewers suddenly become $36-per-user line items. That’s not transformation; that’s a budget boomerang.


The Turn: SaaS fishing isn’t really about software. It’s about misdiagnosed pain. When processes are cluttered, any shiny app looks like a cleanse. But if you don’t fix the workflow, you’ll export the same chaos—just with a new sidebar.


Why we keep biting the hook

  1. The Demo Mirage. In a controlled environment, anything is elegant. Real life is edge cases, partial data, and humans under deadline. If you’re only shown the glossy path, you’re not buying a tool—you’re buying a hallucination.

  2. Executive FOMO. “My buddy on the ski hill said SAP changed their life.” Great. But your five-person finance team is not a Fortune 50 enterprise. Big-league tools are brilliant when you can invest years of craft. Underinvest and you get an elegant database with ugly habits.

  3. No-/Low-/Pro-Code Confetti. If the value prop leans harder on the label than the outcomes, beware. Many “no-code” platforms are just forms + database + a coat of UI paint. That can still be powerful—just don’t mistake a coat of paint for a new frame.

  4. Integration Daydreams. “We have an API” means “the front doors exist,” not “your data will harmonize itself.” Durable integrations are deep, opinionated, and brittle in the hands of casual users. Plan for ongoing care and feeding.


How to stop getting SaaS-fished

  • Demand a sandbox, not a slideshow. Put messy, real data in a trial tenant. Break things. If they won’t give you hands-on access before signature, that’s your red flag.

  • Run a PST (Paid Short Trial). Treat it like insurance on a six-figure decision. Two to four weeks, scoped outcomes, and a go/no-go gate reviewed by cross-functional users who didn’t attend the golf outing.

  • Test with opposites. Pick two early adopters with different jobs and pain. If both can win on the same configuration, you’re onto something more than a persona fairy tale.

  • Model true TCO. Price the system, not just the seats: admin time, enablement, governance, integrations, and the “viewer tax” that sneaks up when dashboards become paywalled.

  • Fix process first, then tool. Map the workflow you want, strip dead rituals, decide your handoffs, then evaluate software against that blueprint. Tools enforce behavior you already designed; they don’t invent it for you.

  • People → Process → Tools (in that order). Assign ownership, define the ritual, and only then choose the app that fits. If the sequence flips, debt accrues.


We don’t need fewer tools—we need fewer illusions. The right product in the wrong process is still the wrong decision. Start by fertilizing your own yard, even if it smells like work. Then shop.


Process Debt Truth: Most SaaS regrets aren’t caused by bad software; they’re caused by buying hope to avoid fixing habits.

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page